| College Roll No. | Average Marks for Written Assignments in Each Term out of 25 | Aggregate Marks of Written Assignments and Project out of 75 | Marks in Project Work out of 25* | H.E. Marks out of* I = 10 | Marks of Written Assignments and Project out of*II = 10 | Atten. Marks out of* III = 5 | Total of I, II, III out of* 25 | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | |||||||
| 2851 | 15 | 22 | 15 | 52 | - | 7.1 | 6.9 | 2 | 16 |
| 2852 | 22 | 22 | 24 | 68 | - | 8 | 9.1 | 4 | 21 |
| 2854 | 20 | 21 | 23 | 64 | - | 6.4 | 8.5 | 0 | 15 |
| 2855 | 19 | 23 | 20 | 62 | - | 7.3 | 8.3 | 3 | 19 |
| 2856 | 15 | 21 | 21 | 57 | - | 6.8 | 7.6 | 0 | 14 |
| 2860 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 30 | - | 4 | 4 | 0 | 8 |
| 2864 | 20 | 22 | 22 | 64 | - | 7.6 | 8.5 | 3 | 19 |
| 2867 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 45 | - | 6.5 | 6 | 0 | 13 |
| 2868 | 15 | 21 | 15 | 51 | - | 0.3 | 6.8 | 0 | 7 |
| 2871 | 15 | 15 | 19 | 49 | - | 7.5 | 6.5 | 0 | 14 |
| 2874 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 45 | - | 6.3 | 6 | 0 | 12 |
| 2880 | 22 | 15 | 19 | 56 | - | 6.7 | 7.5 | 3 | 17 |
| 2882 | 19 | 15 | 15 | 49 | - | 7.3 | 6.5 | 3 | 17 |
| 2883 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 45 | - | 5.5 | 6 | 0 | 12 |
| 2896 | 19 | 22 | 19 | 60 | - | 7.2 | 8 | 5 | 20 |
| 2915 | 22 | 19 | 21 | 62 | - | 7.1 | 8.3 | 5 | 20 |
| 2923 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 69 | - | 8.5 | 9.2 | 2 | 20 |
| 2928 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 45 | - | 4.3 | 6 | 0 | 10 |
| 2940 | 22 | 20 | 22 | 64 | - | 6.9 | 8.5 | 4 | 19 |
| 2948 | 21 | 21 | 15 | 57 | - | 7.6 | 7.6 | 3 | 18 |
| 4784 | 22 | 15 | 15 | 52 | - | 5.3 | 6.9 | 0 | 12 |
| 4788 | 21 | 20 | 15 | 56 | - | 5.1 | 7.5 | 0 | 13 |
| 4804 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 45 | - | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| 4812 | 20 | 17 | 15 | 52 | - | 5.5 | 6.9 | 0 | 12 |
| 4845 | 21 | 15 | 15 | 51 | - | 0 | 6.8 | 0 | 7 |
| 4847 | 0 | 21 | 19 | 40 | - | 5.3 | 5.3 | 0 | 11 |
| 4849 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 15 | - | 6.8 | 2 | 0 | 9 |
Monday, April 5, 2010
B.A.(Prog.) 3rd Year : TOTAL INTERNAL ASSESSMENT RECORD : IRPM (Organisational Behaviour)
B.Sc.(H) Chemistry 2nd Year : TOTAL INTERNAL ASSESSMENT RECORD
| College Roll No. | Average Marks for Written Assignments in Each Term out of 25 | Aggregate Marks of Written Assignments and Project out of 75 | Marks in Project Work out of 25* | H.E. Marks out of* I = 8 | Marks of Written Assignments and Project out of*II = 8 | Atten. Marks out of* III = 4 | Total of I, II, III out of* 20 | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | |||||||
| 6303 | 22 | 22 | 24.5 | 68.5 | - | 6.3 | 7.3 | 0.8 | 14 |
| 6305 | 22 | 19 | 22 | 63 | - | 4.4 | 6.7 | 0 | 11 |
| 6320 | 22 | 21 | 25 | 68 | - | 5.1 | 7.3 | 1.6 | 14 |
| 6325 | 21 | 15 | 23 | 59 | - | 2.6 | 6.3 | 0 | 9 |
| 6327 | 22 | 12 | 20 | 54 | - | 3.9 | 5.8 | 0 | 10 |
| 6333 | 15 | 19 | 24 | 58 | - | 4.1 | 6.2 | 3.2 | 14 |
| 6351 | 20 | 16 | 24 | 60 | - | 4.4 | 6.4 | 0 | 11 |
| 6357 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 2.3 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 6363 | 20 | 17 | 15 | 52 | - | 3.6 | 5.5 | 0 | 9 |
| 6372 | 22 | 23 | 23 | 68 | - | 7.1 | 7.3 | 2.4 | 17 |
| 6375 | 21 | 20 | 20 | 61 | - | 5.1 | 6.5 | 0 | 12 |
| 6409 | 21 | 22 | 25 | 68 | - | 3.6 | 7.3 | 3.2 | 14 |
| 6415 | 24 | 20 | 20 | 64 | - | 5.4 | 6.8 | 0 | 12 |
| 6416 | 15 | 17 | 24 | 56 | - | 2.9 | 6 | 0 | 9 |
| 6423 | 17 | 15 | 24 | 56 | - | 4.2 | 6 | 0 | 10 |
| 7204 | 21 | 18 | 24 | 63 | - | 3.5 | 6.7 | 0 | 10 |
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
HRM Assignment-3 for M.Com. Final Year students of Hans Raj College, 2009-10
You have to submit hand-written answers. Each student has been assigned two questions. Answer each question in 400 words (approx.).
| Roll No. & Name | Questions | |
| 1-Ritika | a) Differentiate between recruitment and selection. Explain the systems approach to selection of employees. | |
|
| b) What is the difference between training and development of employees? Why training is essential in a competitive world? | |
| 2-Sonam | a) Describe the performance appraisal approach. Do you think that managers should also be subject to performance appraisal? | |
|
| b) What is the need for co-operation between labour-unions and management? | |
| 673- Priyanka | a) Explain the role and functions of HR Manager. | |
|
| b) What do you mean by workers' participation in management? Explain the various forms of workers' participation in management? | |
| 9-Sawan | a) Explain different methods of settlement of industrial disputes in India. | |
|
| b) Define the concept of performance appraisal and discuss any two of its methods. | |
| 10-Kirti | a) Define job analysis. Explain the importance of job analysis. | |
|
| b) Explain the significance of Human Resource Planning. Bring out the steps in HR planning process. | |
| 11-Mridu | a) Discuss the various methods of training adopted for managerial personnel. | |
|
| b) What is the relation between morale and productivity? Suggest steps to improve morale and productivity of employees. | |
| 14-Nupur | a) What are the social security measures adopted for the benefit of workers in India ? | |
|
| b) Differentiate between Personnel Management and Human Resource Management. | |
| 674 | a) What are the main causes of industrial disputes in India? | |
|
|
| |
| 16-Richa | a) Differentiate between job description and job analysis with their usage in HRM. | |
|
| b) Write a note on succession planning. | |
| 17-Vinay | a) What are different OD intervention techniques normally adopted in organisations? | |
|
| b) Differentiate between incentives and fringe benefits. Illustrate with suitable examples. | |
| 18-Girish | a) Bring out the salient features of 360 degree appraisal. | |
|
| b) What do you mean by employee morale? Give suggestions for improving the same. | |
| 23-Neeti | a) What do you mean by job specification? Discuss it using examples. | |
|
| b) Critically examine the industrial relations in India during last five years. | |
| 24-Shradha | a) How Executive Development Programmes enhance overall efficiency and productivity? | |
|
| b) Describe the machinery for settlement of industrial disputes in India. | |
| 29-Naranzaya | a) Discuss the needs for training and development of employees. | |
|
| b) What is the importance of Human Resource Planning in the context of globalisation? |
Saturday, December 5, 2009
Assignment-cum-presentation Marks of Chemistry (H) Second year students 2009-10, Hans Raj College
Your marks are as follows. You have been marked on the basis of content and manner of presentation. Those, who have not been assigned any marks, would have to present their assignments on next scheduled date to be announced by me later.
-
Roll No.
Name
Topic
Marks
(out of 25)
6303
Raman Deep Singh
Project Identification and SWOT Analysis
22
6305
Dharitreesh Tripathi
Lease Financing
19
6320
Adish Jain
Advertising
21
6325
Mohit Pal
6327
Deepak Sharma
6333
Diwakar Singh
Basic Start-up Problems in Establishment of Small Scale Enterprises
19
6351
Moses R. P.
Venture Capital in India
16
6363
Tashi Namgyal
Financing Small Business
17
6372
Nitin Gupta
Forms of Business Organisation
23
6375
Saurabh Uttam
Entrepreneurial Motivation
21
6409
Arshad Perwez
Working Capital Management
22
6415
Aniket Mishra
6416
Ajeet
Role of Small Business in Indian Economy
17
6423
Rajat Thapliyal
7204
Saviniyas Nagar
Shares & Debentures
18
Marks awarded by:
Avneesh Kumar
Assistant Professor
Hans Raj College
University of Delhi
Friday, November 6, 2009
HRM Assignment-2 for M.Com. Final students of Hans Raj College, 2009-10
Friday, October 30, 2009
Project Topics (cases) for Students of B.Com.(H) 1st Year Section-4
1.The Indian Contract Act 1872,
(Link to list of some cases:
http://www.du.ac.in/course/material/ug/llb/principal-of-contract-tr1-09.pdf
Link to case material:
http://www.du.ac.in/course/material/ug/llb/principal-of-contract-tr1d-09.pdf)
2.Indian Sale of Goods Act 1932,
(Link to list of some cases:
http://www.du.ac.in/course/material/ug/llb/Comm_Trans_4Contents.pdf
Link to case material:
http://www.du.ac.in/course/material/ug/llb/Commercial Transactions.pdf)
3.Information Technology Act 2000 and
4.Negotiable Instrument Act.
(Link to list of some cases:
http://www.du.ac.in/course/material/ug/llb/Nego_Instru_6.pdf
Link to case material:
http://www.du.ac.in/course/material/ug/llb/Negotiable%20Instruments.pdf)
The two cases should not be related to a single Act.
No student would select any case which has already been selected by any other student. The write-up on each case should consist of at least 600 words. You can submit hand-written or typed answers. Source of the written matter should be specified in "References".
Each student is supposed to declare his/her selection of cases by leaving a comment to this blog article. Please specify your roll no., full name, names of the cases and the relevant Act. Last date for submission of the Assignment is 19th December.
| S.No. | Roll No. | Case 1 | Case 2 |
| 1 | 181 |
|
|
| 2 | 185 |
|
|
| 3 | 189 |
|
|
| 4 | 193 | Mohiri Bibi vs. Dharmodas Ghosh |
|
| 5 | 194 |
|
|
| 6 | 195 |
|
|
| 7 | 199 | Street vs Blay(sales of goods act) |
|
| 8 | 201 | Hadley vs. Baxendale,1854
(Indian Contract Act 1872). | Kursell vs Timber Operators and Contractors Limited,1927 |
| 9 | 213 |
| Telu Ram Jain vs M/S Aggarwal and Sons (Sale of Goods Act)
|
| 10 | 217 |
|
|
| 11 | 218 |
|
|
| 12 | 221 |
|
|
| 13 | 225 |
|
|
| 14 | 226 |
|
|
| 15 | 227 |
|
|
| 16 | 228 |
|
|
| 17 | 232 | Felthouse Vs Bindley |
|
| 18 | 233 |
|
|
| 19 | 239 | Ratan Lal vs. Metropolitan Insurance
Co. Ltd. (Indian Contract Act 1872) | Union of India vs. K H Rao 1977 (Sale of Goods Act)
|
| 20 | 240 | Baflour vs Baflour(indian contract act) | Tarling vs Baxter (sale of goods act) |
| 21 | 241 |
|
|
| 22 | 242 |
|
|
| 23 | 247 |
|
|
| 24 | 248 |
|
|
| 25 | 256 |
|
|
| 26 | 258 | Dada Silk Mills And Ors.vs Indian Overseas Bank | Banarsi Dass And Co.vs Lulla Mal |
| 27 | 264 | Kumbakonam Electric Supply vs Join Commercial Tax Officer | Muthaya Manivaran vs Lakku Reddiar And Ors. |
| 28 | 265 |
|
|
| 29 | 288 |
|
|
| 30 | 294 |
|
|
| 31 | 296 | Abdul Aziz v/s Masum Ali | Macdonald v/s Longbottom |
| 32 | 297 | Doraiswami Iyer v Arunachala Ayyar(Indian Contract Act) | Butterworth v Kingsway Motors Ltd(Sale Of Goods Act) |
| 33 | 298 |
|
|
| 34 | 299 | Harris vs. Nickerson's(1873)(Indian Contract Act) | Griffith v Peter Conway (1939)(S G Act)
|
| 35 | 300 |
|
|
| 36 | 301 |
|
|
| 37 | 302 |
|
|
| 38 | 303 |
|
|
| 39 | 304 |
|
|
| 40 | 305 |
|
|
| 41 | 306 |
|
|
| 42 | 307 | Carlill vs carbolic smoke ball company(1893). | Badri Prasad vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (Sale of Goods Act)
|
| 43 | 308 |
|
|
| 44 | 309 |
|
|
| 45 | 316 |
|
|
| 46 | 319 |
|
|